SEO Marketing

Comment from brettdusek
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

I wouldn’t trust …
I wouldn’t trust much of what Matt Cutts says anymore. Just like the US military, disinformation is a primary strategy. Some of his recent discussions are shaky at best.

Certainly good architecture plays a ranking factor and can’t understand why this is still being disputed?

Comment from ajayg514
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

I would agree that …
I would agree that its not a ranking factor, however…

W3C standards are honored by browsers, and spiders alike. I am no expert, but if you have two documents, one has proper structure, while another doesn’t, I would rather parse the document with proper structure.

Its like a compiler for HTML. Many users are often unaware of their HTML flaws. W3C helps eliminate potential problems like invalid characters, closing/opening tags, attributes, and much more.

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Take a look at Mat …
Take a look at Mat Cutts video on why W3C is not a ranking factor, he just recentlt discussed this.

Comment from ajayg514
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

SEO can best be …
SEO can best be done by knowing the fundamentals of HTML. Make sure you understand the value of w3c validation. TheMusicAge attempts this and is fairly successful. Google “SEO TheMusicAge” or “TheMusicAge Marketing” for more information.

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Thanks!
Thanks!

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Good point here …
Good point here Joel, definitely NOT going to hurt you, so if you have time go for it. I think the big thing is not thinking that these tactics will skyrocket you to the top.

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

great point, I’m …
great point, I’m digging the tools over at SEOmoz lately when doing competitive analysis to know what we’re going up against.

Comment from wwwSEOWritersNet
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Consideration three …
Consideration three: know your competition. How well you do in the search engine results is a function how much hard work you have put in relation to that of your competition. You want to make sure you work harder and more diligently than those against whom you are competing so keep this in mind when writing your website and article content.

Comment from TheWealthyPromoter
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Ok after over a …
Ok after over a week of deliberating over SocialBlaster, I made my decision today to go with this has been the next best decision I have made in a long time.

Simple, and very effective…update to 40 + networks with multiple accounts

NO MORE iMACROS bullchyt for me…THANK GOD!!

Comment from MegaCommenter
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

I definitely agree …
I definitely agree with you. In case I have some spare time, I will navigate to your web.

Comment from chookylynn
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

There are heaps of …
There are heaps of things you CAN do, but unless you either have unlimited time (and want to be glued to the computer 24/7) or a huge team to help, it makes sense to concentrate your efforts on those things that will produce best results. Good stuff.

Comment from joeldeg
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

meta tags and …
meta tags and submitting your site isn’t going to hurt you But if you only have 5 minutes at the end of the day your time is better spent establishing strong links with relevant sites rather than working on the other items. But if you have time for both, go for it. (or get one of the interns to do it)

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Agreed on the crawl …
Agreed on the crawl thing, this video is a little old, and as usual I go off on tangents I just can’t help it

Thanks for dropping some feedback.

Comment from FrozzzenPuck
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

I’m kinda on the …
I’m kinda on the fence with this video, you make some good points and then you go off on a tangent :/ You title the vid best practice, um meta tags are a best practice just leave it at that. It’s been a practice since the beginning and still is today. And submitting your site to Google to crawl to let them know your updating etc etc… does speed up the process, it’s another best practice.

Comment from victoraul1
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

that It is true, it …
that It is true, it has no impact, at least for Google or Yahoo, they just find them anyway thats their job

Comment from stalbanswebdesignseo
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

this guys the nuts
this guys the nuts

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

It won’t hurt you, …
It won’t hurt you, that is correct.

Comment from arsenjan818
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

While some of the …
While some of the things you mentioned don’t count as much, it doesn’t hurt to have it either. Extra effort pays off in my opinion.

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

I just don’t do it, …
I just don’t do it, it just has no impact IMHO – you can do it though for sure.

Comment from EducoMarketing
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Dig the talk but, …
Dig the talk but, why would you say not to submit your site when it takes no time at all… Just don’t understand why google and yahoo would build these capabilities if they don’t use them?

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Thanks!
Thanks!

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

I don’t know if I’d …
I don’t know if I’d say having a blog is always the best SEO tool, like any tool it is really what you decide to do with it, right?

Thanks very much for commenting! Much appreciated.

Comment from semaphorian01
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:19 pm

Hi,

Very …
Hi,

Very interesting video

Comment from Tomlprofile
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:20 pm

That´s …
That´s interesting.If you have a blog, you all ready have the best SEO tool available.

Comment from wilreynolds
Time November 30, 2009 at 11:20 pm

Thanks, checked out …
Thanks, checked out your channel, VERY useful / inventive, (not for me obviously)

Thanks for subscribing!